La jurisprudences de CEDH - page 795

Nb provided jor in Article 32. paragraph I . of the Cornration has elapsed erithuut the case huriug been brmtght beJ o re the European Court of Human Krg hu' in pursuance of Article 48 oj the Converuion : Whereas, in their applications iatroduced betwecn 2! April 1 976 and 9 October 1979 . the applicants complained principallv uf having been detained pursunru to the discipliaary sanctions oj light or strict arrest ordered during a period uJservice bv their oJfcird superiors or outside periods oj service by the curapeteru ruilirnn , enrthorities. without any court decisious, thus allegtteg that tlrcir deprivation oj liberty was...

modifier quoi que ce soit après l'audition . Il Paut relever cependant que, dans une procédure non contentieuse, le jugenient de lère instance est susceptible d'être revu daus son intégralité par la juridiction supérieure, laquelle est habilitée à examiner le t'ait comme le droit . Le requérant avait donc la possibilité réelle de présenler son point de vue sur les déclarations de ses enfants, au ninins devant le tribunal régional de Vienne . Cette juridiction a examiné son appel où il exposait de tait son point de vue sur ces déclarations . Cependant, coninte le requérant ne sentble pas avoir précisé le genre de...

APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 9097/80 X . v/BELGIU M X . c/BELGIQU E DECISION of 13 October 1982 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 13 octobre 1982 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Arlicle 25 de le Conventlon : A foreigner served w•ith a deportation order to leave the couutrr where he or she is living canuot, on this ground, clairn a breach of the Convention, if he or she has been allowed to return shortlv after to the countn, concerned and to obtairt a residence pemtit there . Article 26 of the Convention : As regards the condition of access to an appeals authorlrv. can new dnmestir jurisprudence introduced onlv a few...

Whereas on /4 February 1983 the Commission transrnitled the said report to the Committee oJ'Ministers atd whereas the period of three ntonths pruvided Jbr in Article 32, paragraph 1, of the Convention has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Righls in pursuance of Article 48 of the Convention : Whereas in his application intmduced on 19 April 1979 the applicant, a French national. complained of his detention and clainted that in view nf his state of health he ottght to be released. subntitting that he authorities' rejection oJ his request Jor release constituted inhuman treatment : Whereas the...

APPLICATIONS/REQUETES N° 8588/79 8589/7 9 Lars BRAMELID and Anne-Marie MALMSTROM v/SWEDEN Lars BRAMELID et Anne-Ma ri e MALMSTROM c/SUED E DECISION of 12 October 1982 on the admissibility of the applications DÉCISION du 12 octobre 1982 sur la recevabilité des requêtes Article 6, paragraph I of the Convention :In the case of a dispute involving civil rights and obligations, does a compulso ry arbitration procedure with lintited possibilities of appeal to a court meet the requirements of Article 6, paragraph I ? Complaint declared admissible . Article 26 of the Convention :/n proceedings concerning the right to purchase crnnparty...

APPLICA77ON/REQUETE N° 9295/8 1 X . v/AUS7'RI A X . c/AUTRICH E DECISION of 6 October 1982 on the admissibilitv of the application DECISION du 6 octobre 1982 sur la recevabilité de la requét e A rticle 6, paragraph 2 of the Convention : The presumption of innocence is not only obligatory for the criminal courts but also for State-authorities . After acquittal, the civil cou rt can establish the civil responsibility of the person concerned in respect of the same set of facts. but it is bound by the finding of the crimina l court that there is no criminal guilt . Artlcle 6, peragrephe 2, de la Convention : La présomption d'innocence...

APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 9531 /8 1 X . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMAN Y X . c/RÈPUBLIQUE FÉDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 6 October 1982 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 6 octobre 1982 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 6, peragraph 2 of the Convention : This provision does not oblige States to bear the experrses of a person in respect of whonr criminal proceedings have been discontiruted . Artlcle 6, paragrephe 2, de la Conventlon : Cette disposition n'oblige pas les Etats à supporter les débours d'une personne qui, après avoir été poursuivie pénalement . est mise au bénéfice d'un non-lieu...

APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 9702/8 2 X . v/the UNITED KINGDO M X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 6 October 1982 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 6 octobre 1982 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 8 of the Conventlon : The obligation for a householder to complete a census form is an interference with the right to respect for private and family life. This interference, justifted in the interest of the economic well-being of the country, may be considered necessary in a democratic society, taking into accourrt the precautions taken to ensure the confidentiality of the information thus collected. Article 8 de la...

APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 9707/8 2 X . v/SWEDE N X . c/SUSD E DECISION of 6 October 1982 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 6 octobre 1982 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Artlcle 6, peragraph I of the Convention : Paternity proceedings concern civil rights and obligations . In the light of the requirement of the proper administration of justice, the existence oja reasonable time limit%r the institution of paternity pmceedings is not contrary to Article 6, paragraph ! . Article 14 of the Convention In coqj unctlon with Article 6, peragraph I of the Convention : The suppression by an amendment in the law with effect ex...

APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 9889/8 2 X . v/FRANC E X . c/FRANC E DECISION of 6 October 1982 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DECISION du 6 octobre 1982 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article I of the First Protocol : To the extent that it constitutes an interference with the right to peaceful enjoyrnent of possessions and provided that it is not disproportionate, a mortgage in favour of tax authorities as a guarantee for the paynrertt of evaded taxes or fines is aawfu! control of the use of property . Article 1- du Protocole adrllllonnef : Dans la rnesure où elle constitue une atteinte au droit au respèct des biens...