Page 812 des 8 578 résultats trouvés :
| AFFAIRE LUEDICKE, BELKACEM ET KOÇ c. ALLEMAGNE (ARTICLE 50)
COUR CHAMBRE AFFAIRE LUEDICKE, BELKACEM ET KOÇ c. ALLEMAGNE ARTICLE 50 Requête no 6210/73; 6877/75; 7132/75 ARRÊT STRASBOURG 10 mars 1980 En l’affaire Luedicke, Belkacem et Koç, La Cour européenne des Droits de l’Homme, constituée, conformément à l’article 43 art. 43 de la Convention de sauvegarde des Droits de l’Homme et des Libertés fondamentales "la Convention" et aux clauses pertinentes de son règlement, en une chambre composée des juges dont le nom suit: MM. G. WIARDA, président, H. MOSLER, Mme D. BINDSCHEDLER-ROBERT, M. W. GANSHOF VAN DER MEERSCH, remplaçant Mme H. PEDERSEN...
| AFFAIRE KÖNIG c. ALLEMAGNE (ARTICLE 50)
Art. 41 PREJUDICE MORAL ... COUR PLÉNIÈRE AFFAIRE KÖNIG c. ALLEMAGNE ARTICLE 50 Requête no 6232/73 ARRÊT STRASBOURG 10 mars 1980 En l’affaire König, La Cour européenne des Droits de l’Homme, statuant en séance plénière par application de l’article 48 de son règlement et composée des juges dont le nom suit: MM. G. BALLADORE PALLIERI, président, G. WIARDA, H. MOSLER, M. ZEKIA, J. CREMONA, Thór VILHJÁLMSSON, W. GANSHOF VAN DER MEERSCH, Mme D. BINDSCHEDLER-ROBERT, MM. D. EVRIGENIS, P.-H. TEITGEN, G. LAGERGREN, L. LIESCH, F. GÖLCÜKLÜ, F. MATSCHER, J. PINHEIRO FARINHA...
APPLICATION/REQUÃTE N° 8346/7 8 X . v/AUSTRI A X . c/AUTRICH E DECISION of 6 March 1980 on the admissibility of the application DÃCISION du 6 mars 1980 sur la recevabilité de la requête Article 26 of the Convention : An app/icant who shows, from decided cases, that seeking domestic remedies is doomed to failure is excused from pursuing such remedies . Article 1, paragraph 2 of the First Protocol : A rule providing that prison authorities should retain a portion of income from prison work to provide a lump sum on release ts not in breach of this provision, even if interest is not paid. Article 26 de la Convention : Est dispens...
APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 8581/7 9 X . v/the UNITED KINGDO M X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 6 March 1980 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DECISION du 6 mars 1980 sur la recevabilité de la requéte Arllcle 3 of the Convention : The expulsion or extradition of an individual towards a country where there are serious reasons to believe that he will be subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention, raises a problem under this provision . Does this also apply when the danger does not arise from the public authorities but from autonomous groups against which the authorities allegedly do not protect the individual...
| X. c. REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE
APPLICATION/REQUÃTE N° 8724/7 9 X v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMAN Y X . c/RÃPUBLIOUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 6 March 1980 on the admissibilitY of the applicatio n DECISION dr, 6 inars 1980 sur la recevabilité de la requèt e Article 1 of the First Protocol : A general obligation on States to maintain the purchn.sing power of surns deposited with banking or linancial institutions by way of a sy.stenratic indexation of savings cannot be derived /rorn this provision. Article 1 du Protocole additionnel : On ne saurait déduire de cette disposition une obligation qénérale des Etats de maintenir constant le pouvoir d'achat r/es...
APPLICATION/REl1UETE N°8289/7 8 X .v/AUSTRI A X . c/AUTRICH E DECISION of 5 March 1980 on the admissibility of the application DÃCISION du 5 mars 1980 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 6 of the Convention : In the area of criminal law, the safeguards of Artic% 6apply in principle to appeal proceedings which only concern sentence . Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention : Equality of arms. In the course of criminal appeal proceedings before the Supreme Court, written communications between the Judge Rapporteur and the Attorney-General allegedly kept secret from the defence. Complaint declared admissible . Article 6...
APPLICATION/REDUÃTE N° 7950/77 X ., Y . and Z . v/AUSTRI A X ., Y . et Z . c/ AUTRICH E DECISION of 4 March 1980 on the admissibility of the application DÃCISION du 4 mars 1980 sur la recevabilité de la requéte A rticles 5 and 26 of the Convention : Where less than six months have ellapsed since the final domestic decision refusing compensarion claimed in respect of detention allegedly in breach of Article 5, the Commission may examine the compatibility of this detention with Article 5, insofar as the claim for compensation constituted an effective remedy. Article 5, paragraph 5 of the Convention : A complaint based on this provision...
| X., Y. et Z. c. REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE
APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 8387/7 8 X ., Y . and Z . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY X ., Y . and Z . c/REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 4 March 1980 on the admissibility of the application DÃCISION du 4 mars 1980 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 10 of the Convention : Examination of the grounds upon which a Courr forbade the distribution of a circular critical of an industrial company's attitude, the author of which was not in a position to prove the accuracy of his allegations of the Convention : No duty to exhaust a remedy when the poin t .Article26 at issue has already been rejected by the competent authority...
Art. 34 RECOURS, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 35-1 EPUISEMENT DES VOIES DE RECOURS INTERNES, Art. 6-1 ACCES A UN TRIBUNAL, Art. 6-1... COUR CHAMBRE AFFAIRE DEWEER c. BELGIQUE Requête no 6903/75 ARRÊT STRASBOURG 27 février 1980 En l’affaire Deweer, La Cour européenne des Droits de l’Homme, constituée, conformément à l’article 43 art. 43 de la Convention de sauvegarde des Droits de l’Homme et des Libertés fondamentales "La Convention" et aux clauses pertinentes de son règlement, en une chambre composée des juges dont le nom suit: MM. H. MOSLER, président, M. ZEKIA, R. RYSSDAL, W. GANSHOF...
Art. 35-1 EPUISEMENT DES VOIES DE RECOURS INTERNES ... APPLICATIQN/REQUETE N° 8500/7 9 X . v/SWITZERLAN D X . c/SUISS E DECISION of 14 December 1979 on the admissibility of the âpplication DÃCISION du 14 décembre 1979 sur la recevabilité de la requèt e Articfe 4, paragraph 3 a of the Convention : Juvenile delinquent compefled to work during his placement under observation, in a closed institution . Question whether this work was that "required to be done in theordinary course of detention". Article 5, paragraph 1d of the Convention : A juvenile, accused of a number of offences placed in a closed institution for observation...