La jurisprudences de CEDH - page 819

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 6-1 ACCES A UN TRIBUNAL, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE ... COUR CHAMBRE AFFAIRE LUEDICKE, BELKACEM ET KOÇ c. ALLEMAGNE Requête no 6210/73; 6877/75; 7132/75 ARRÊT STRASBOURG 28 novembre 1978 En l’affaire Luedicke, Belkacem et Koç La Cour européenne des Droits de l’Homme, constituée, conformément à l’article 43 art. 43 de la Convention de sauvegarde des Droits de l’Homme et des Libertés fondamentales "la Convention" et à l’article 21 du règlement, en une chambre composée des juges dont le nom suit: MM.  G. WIARDA, président, H. MOSLER, Mmes H...

Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 34 RECOURS, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 SECURITE NATIONALE, Art.... APPLICATIQN/REQUtTE N° 7308/7 5 X . v/the UNITED KINGDO M X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 12 October 1978 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DÉCISION du 12 octobre 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article B, paragraph 2 and Article 10, paragraph 2 of the Convention : An interference is "in accordance with the law" even if it is based on delegated legislation which has been enacted on the basis of a statute stricto sensu . The seizure of magazines depicting adults engaged in...

Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 34 RECOURS, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 SECURITE NATIONALE, Art.... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7669/76 X . Company v/the NETHERLANDS Société X . c/PAYS-BA S DECISION of 12 October 1978 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DÉCISIQN du 12 octobre 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e A rticle 1, paragraph 2 of the First Protocol : Contribution required from companies in a pa rticular branch of industry by virtue of a collective agreement to which compulsory effect had been given by ministerial decree . Article 1- , paragraphe 2, du Protocole...

Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 34 RECOURS, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 SECURITE NATIONALE, Art.... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 7909/74 X . and Y v/AUSTRI A X . et Y . c/AUTRICH E DECISION of 12 October 1978 on the admissibility of the applicatio n . DÉCISION du 12 octobre 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Article 6, paragraph 3 Ibl of the Convention a This provision can only be invoked by the accused, and not by his counsel personafly . b . Opening of the trial fixed at an early date . Examination in the light of the circumstances of .the concrete case, of the preparatory time of...

Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 34 RECOURS, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 SECURITE NATIONALE, Art.... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 7610/7 6 X . v/the UNITED KINGDO M X c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 9 May 1977 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 9 mai 1977 sur la recevabllité de la requèt e A rticle 8, paragraph 2 of the Convention : Justification of judicial decisions authorising the almost complete rupture of contacts between young children and their father, called upon to serv e a long sentence and whose marriage has been annulled. Article 8, paragraphe 2, de la Convention...

Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 34 RECOURS, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 SECURITE NATIONALE, Art.... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7864/7 7 X . v/BELGIU M X c/BELGIQU E DECISION of 9 October 1978 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DÉCISION du 9 octobre 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 2 of the First Protocol : Therecognition, by a diploma, of studies completed abroad may be subject to an examination, in conformity with the ru/es in force in each State . Article 2 du Protocole additionnel : La reconnaissance, par un diplôme, des études accomplies à l'étranger peut étre...

Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 34 RECOURS, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 SECURITE NATIONALE, Art.... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N°8295/78 X . v/the UNITED KINGDO M -X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 9 October 1978 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DÉCISION du 9 octobre 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 6 paragraph 3 c of the Convention : The right to choose freely one's defence counsel is not an absolute one . The fact that a particufar .fawyer, is not allowed, given his personal interest in a case, to repmsent an accused person does not violate this provfsion...

Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 34 RECOURS, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 SECURITE NATIONALE, Art.... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7775/7 7 Mario DE NAPOLES PACHECO v/BELGIUM Mario DE NAPOLES PACHECO c/BELGIOU E DECISION of 5 October 1978 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 5 octobre 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Article 1, paragraph I of the First Protocof a A claim may constitute "possessions ". b. There can be no quesrion of deprivation of possessions if a condirional claim lapses as a result of the non-fulfilment of the condition . Competence ratione temporis : The...

Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 34 RECOURS, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 SECURITE NATIONALE, Art.... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7986/77 Petra KRAUSE v/SWITZERLAND ' Petra KRAUSE c/SUISSE ' DECISION of 3 October 1978 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 3 octobre 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 3 ol the Convention : Examinations of the conditions of detention o/a person p/aced in solidarity confinement . Article 6, paragraph 2 of the Convention : The presumption of innocence is not limited to procedural guaranrees ; it requires that no representative of the...

Art. 13 DROIT A UN RECOURS EFFECTIF, Art. 34 RECOURS, Art. 34 VICTIME, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE, Art. 6-1 SECURITE NATIONALE, Art.... APPLICATIQN/REQUÉTE N° 8059/7 7 X . and Y . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMAN Y X . et Y . c/REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 3 October 1978 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISIQN du 3 octobre 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requéte Article 8, paragraph 2 of the Convention : As a general rule, it is preferable that a child be raised at home rather . than in a public institution. Only very serious reasons justify that a child be removed-from his family and placed in...