La jurisprudences de CEDH - page 848

APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 6753/74 X . and Y . v/the NETHERLANDS X . et Y . c/PAYS-BA S DECISION of 19 December 1974 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 19 décembre 1974 sur la recevabilité de la requPt e Article 8 of the Convention : Whether the relationshi/is between minors are protected by the right to respect for private life unresolved . A minor child's forced return to her parents' residence, constitutes, in the circumstances of the case, an exercise of respect for the lffe of her family and a measure necessa ry for the protection of her health and morals within the meaning of paragraph 2 of this provision : This...

APPLICATION/REQU ETE N° 6776/74 X . v/SWEDEN X . c/SUED E DECISION of 19 December 1974 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 19 décembre 1974 sur la recevabilité de la requéte Article 1 of Protocol No . 1 : Obligation of a State to ensure an individual's right to peaceful enjoyment of his property. Cannot reasonably imply any right to claim financial support by the State in order to make possible the enjoyment of possessions . Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention : Determination of a claim for research fund and salary. Lies within the discretion of the administrative authorities and falls within the field of public...

APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 5029/71 Gerhard KLASS and others v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY Gerhard KLASS et autres c/REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION OF 18 December 1974 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 18 décembre 1974 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Artic/e25 of the Convention : Persons who may have been the subject of measures and not subsequently informed of these measures taken against them . May claim to be the victims of a violation of the Convention. Artic/e 27, paragraph 2 of the Convention : An application raising complex questions of law, which are also of a general interest, cannot be...

APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 6062/73 X . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY X . ctREPUBLIQUE FEDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 18 December 1974 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 18 décembre 1974 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Article 6, paragraph 2, of the Convention : When deciding on a civil matter in relation to criminal proceedings against one of the parties, the civil judge is not bound to apply the princrple of presumption ot innocence . Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention : Whether judicial decisions in a civil case could have prejudiced the position of one party in criminal appeal proceedings . Article...

APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 6167/ 73 X . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY X . c/RÉPUBLIQUE FÉDERALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 18 December 1974 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 18 décembre 1974 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 9 of the Convention : Marriage cannot be considered simply as a torm of expression of thought, conscience or religion but is governed by the specific provisions of Article 12. Article 12 of the Convention : An obligation to contract a marriage in accordance with forms prescribed by law rather than a perticular religious ritual is not a refusal of the right to marry. Articfe 9 de fe...

APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 6849/7 2 Christian MULLER v/AUSTRIA Christian MÜLLER c/AUTRICH E DECISION of 16 December 1974 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 16 décembre 1974 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Article I of Protocol No. 1 : The obligation to pay contributions to a social security scheme may, in certain circumstances, create a property right over a portion of the assets thus constituted. Article 74 of the Convention, in conjunction with Article I of Protocol No. 1 : Article 14 prohibits discrimination only with respect to the enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in the Convention . Article 13 of...

APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 6099/ 73 X . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY X . c/REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 14 December 1974 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 14 décembre 1974 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 6, paragraph 7, of the Convention : Length of civil proceedings. Long delay, due to the preparetion of an expert opinion . Applicant having refused that another expert be appointed. Applicant must be taken to have consented to the necessa ry delay. Article 76 of the Convention : The hierarchical complaint "Dienstaufsichtsbeschwerde" in German law against a judge in a civil suit of law...

APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 6481/74 X . v/ITALY X . c/ITALI E DECISION of 12 December 1974 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 12 décembre 1974 sur la recevabilité de la requéte Articie 25 of the Convention : The Convention does not provide for eny "actio populans" . Every applicant must claim to be a victim of a violation of the Convention . Article 25 de la Convention : La Convention ne prAvoit pas d'rr actio popularis », mais exige que le requérant se prétende victime d'une violation de la Convention . IEnglish : see below Extrait de la décision Le requérant, demeurant à Reggio Calabria, parait vouloir agir au...

APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 6729/7 4 X . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY X . c/REPUBLIQUE FEDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 12 December 1974 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 12 décembre 1974 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 26 of the Convention : An appeal to the Constitutional Court of a Land is not sufficient where there is at the same time, the possibility of appeafing to the Federef Constitutional Cou rt. Article 26 de fe Convention : Le recours à la Cour constitutionnelle d'un Land n'épuise pas les voies de recours internes lorsqu'un recours à la Cour constitutionnelle fAdérale est ouvert...

APPLICATION / REQUETE N° 6357/7 3 X . v ./the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY X . c/REPUBLIQUE FEDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 8 October 1974 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 8 octobre 1974 sur la recevabilité de la requête Articie 8 of the Convention : The exclusion of a person from a country where close members of his family are living can amount to a violation of Article 8. Article 8, paragraph 2 of the Convention : A substantial interference with the family life of a person who has not committed any serious criminal offence, may not be justified on the grounds of public safety or the prevention of disorder...