La jurisprudences de CEDH - page 799

Art. 6-1 ACCUSATION EN MATIERE PENALE, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE ... APPLICATION/R.EQUETE N° 8848/80 Albert BENTHEM v/the NETHERLAND S Albert BENTHEM c/ PAYS-BA S DECISION of 10 March 1982 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DÉCISION du 10 mars 1982 sur la recevabilité de la requête Article 6, paragraph I of the Convention : Is this provision applicable to appeal proceedings brought by the authorities, which lead to a decree by the Crown of the Netherlands . issued following advice of the Council of State, in which it refuses to confirm a licence granted to the applicant to exploit a liquid petrol gas installation? 1jso...

Art. 6-1 ACCUSATION EN MATIERE PENALE, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 9186/80 Albert DE CUBBER v/BELGIU M Albe rt DE CUBBER c/BELGIQU E DECISION of 9 March 1982 on the admissibility of the application DECISiON du 9 mars 1982 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 6, paragraph I of the Convention : Was the trial Court impartial when one of its judges has sat on the case in his capacity of investigating judge ? Complaint declared admissible . Article 26 of the Convention : The requirement of exhaustion of domestic remedies has been cotnplied with if the applicant has raised in substance before highest...

Art. 6-1 ACCUSATION EN MATIERE PENALE, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE ... APPLICATION/REQUBTE N° 8231/78 X . v/the UNITED KINGDO M X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 6 March 1982 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 6 mars 1982 sur la recevabilit6 de la requêt e Artlcle 3 of the Convention : a Even faced with an obstructive attitude, the authorities are not excused from their obligations imposed by this provision . b The fact that a prisoner is naked as a result of his refusal to wear a prison uniform which was available for him cannot be considered as a punishment. c Prisoner prevented from participating in the...

Art. 6-1 ACCUSATION EN MATIERE PENALE, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE ... APPLICATTON/REQUEI'E N° 8435/78 X . v/the UNITED KINGDOM X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 6 March 1982 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 6 mars 1982 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 6, paragreph I end Ar ticle 26 of the Conveutloo : . When the complaint is one of the length of criminal proceedings an application by the accused to accelerate the proceedings cannot be regarded as an effective remedy . Such an application would not have afforded redress f the violation complained oJ or which concerned the allegedly excessive length of...

Art. 6-1 ACCUSATION EN MATIERE PENALE, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE ... APPIICATION/REQUETE N° 9088/8 0 X . v/UNITED KINGDO M X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 6 March 1982 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DÉCISION du 6 mars 1982 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 5, paragraph I f of the Convention : The length of detention pending deportation can only be examined in the light of this provision . If the detention is prolonged, it is up to the interested party to reniew his request for release habeas corpus . Artlcle 5, paragraph 4 of the Convention :/n the United Kingdom habeas corpus proceedings constitute a...

Art. 6-1 ACCUSATION EN MATIERE PENALE, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 8966/8 0 Francesco GODDI v/ITAL Y Francesco GODDI c/ITALI E DECISION of 5 March 1982 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 5 mars 1982 sur la recevabilité de la requête Article 6, paragraph 3c of the Convention : Applicant detained, convicted on appeal in another town in his absence and in the absence of the lawyer of his choice, but in the presence of a lawyer offiéially assigned to him on the day of the hearing . Has he been able to exercise the right to defend himself? Complaint declared admissible . Article 6...

Art. 6-1 ACCUSATION EN MATIERE PENALE, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 9261 /8 I X . v/the UNITED KINGDO M X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 3 March 1982 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 3 mars 1982 sur la recevabilité de la requête Artlcle 3 of the Convention : Emotional stress and anxiety suffered as a result of the expropriation of a person's home do not confer to the expropriation the churacter of inhuman treatmer :t . Artlcle 6, paragraph I of the Convention : This provision concerns all proceedings which determine a dispute over the expropriation of private property or its compulsory...

Art. 3 PEINE DEGRADANTE, Art. 3 PEINE INHUMAINE, P1-2 DROIT A L'INSTRUCTION ... Dès lors, la High Court et la Court of Appeal ont pu exantiner la substance du grief tiré par la requérante de l'article 8 de la Convention et auraient pu annuler la décision du ntinistre si elles s'étaient prononcées en faveur de la requérante dans la procédure litigieuse . La Conunission en conclut que la procédure en question a donc satisfait aux exigences de l'article 13 . lu en liaison avec l'article 8 de la Convention . Il en découle que, sur ce point, le grief de la requérante est nianifestenient niai fondé . au sens de l'article...

Art. 3 PEINE DEGRADANTE, Art. 3 PEINE INHUMAINE, P1-2 DROIT A L'INSTRUCTION ... COUR CHAMBRE AFFAIRE CAMPBELL ET COSANS c. ROYAUME-UNI Requête no 7511/76; 7743/76 ARRÊT STRASBOURG 25 février 1982 En l'affaire Campbell et Cosans, La Cour européenne des Droits de l'Homme, constituée, conformément à l'article 43 art. 43 de la Convention de sauvegarde des Droits de l'Homme et des Libertés fondamentales "la Convention" et aux clauses pertinentes de son règlement, en une chambre composée des juges dont le nom suit: M.  R. RYSSDAL, président, M.  J. CREMONA, M.  THÓR VILHJÁLMSSON, M.  L...

Art. 3 PEINE DEGRADANTE, Art. 3 PEINE INHUMAINE, P1-2 DROIT A L'INSTRUCTION ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 8225/7 8 Leonard John ASHINGDANE v/the UNITED KINGDO M Leonard John ASHINGDANE c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 5 February 1982 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 5 février 1982 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Artlcle 5, paragraph 1e of the Conventlon : Case of a criminally insane person whose state of mental health warranted his transJer from a secure to a more open institution . Do the exigencies of "lawful" detention extend to the nature and conditions of detention ? Artlcle 5, paragraph 4 and AAlcle 6...