La jurisprudences de CEDH - page 811

Art. 35-1 EPUISEMENT DES VOIES DE RECOURS INTERNES, Art. 35-3 RATIONE TEMPORIS, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 8363/7 8 X . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY X c/REPUBLIOUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 12 May 1980 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 12 mai 1980 sur la recevabilité de la requèt e Article 1, paragraph 1 of the First Protoco/ :/s the right to the use of a burial plot of unlimited duration which does not amount to ownership of the land itself a right to property ? tOuestion not pursued . Article 1, paragraph 2 of the First Protocol : A provision regulating the...

Art. 35-1 EPUISEMENT DES VOIES DE RECOURS INTERNES, Art. 35-3 RATIONE TEMPORIS, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE ... APPLICATIQN/REQUÈTE N° 7653/76 Felix AGNEESSENS v/Belgium Félix AGNEESSENS c/Belgiqu e DECISION of 9 May 1980 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISIQN du 9 mai 1980 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 6, paragraph 1 of the Convention : Refusal of permission to institute civil action in the course of criminal proceedings . Complaint manifestly ill-founded ; applicant had access to civil courts. Arilcle 6, paragraphe 1, de la Convention : Refus d'une constitution de partie civile dans un procAs pénal...

Art. 35-1 EPUISEMENT DES VOIES DE RECOURS INTERNES, Art. 35-3 RATIONE TEMPORIS, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7891 /7 7 X . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMAN Y X . c/RÉPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 6 May 19801Striking off the list of cases DECISION du 6 Mai 19801Radiation du r61e 1 Artic% 6, paragraph 3 e, of the Convention : C/aim for inrerpreters' costs abandoned by national authorities after the decision ot the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Luedicke, Belkacem and Koc . Artic% 27 of the Convention : The question of costs does not arise on the consideration of the...

Art. 35-1 EPUISEMENT DES VOIES DE RECOURS INTERNES, Art. 35-3 RATIONE TEMPORIS, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE ... APPLICATION/flEQUETE N° 8407/78 X . v/SWITZERLAN D X . c/SUISS E DECISION of 6 May 1980 on the admissibility of the application DECISIQN du 6 mai 1980 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 6, paragraph 1 o f the Convention : This provision does not pmvent Contracting States from regulating access to appeal jurlsdictions, especially as far as time limits are concerned . Case where intending appellant resident abroad. Article 6 paragraphe 1, de la Convention : Cette disposition n'empAche pas les Etats contractants...

Art. 35-1 EPUISEMENT DES VOIES DE RECOURS INTERNES, Art. 35-3 RATIONE TEMPORIS, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE ... APPLICATION/REOUETE N° 8604/79 X . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMAN Y X . c/REPUBLIOUE FÉDERALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 6 May 1980 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 6 mai 1980 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Article 8 of the Convention : The family of a person who has been married twice includes the children of both the first and second marriages and as far as alimony rs concerned, Article 8 does not guarantee any priority to the household over the children of the first marriage . Article 8 de...

Art. 35-1 EPUISEMENT DES VOIES DE RECOURS INTERNES, Art. 35-3 RATIONE TEMPORIS, Art. 6-1 PROCES EQUITABLE ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 8249/7 8 X . v/BELGIU M X . c/BELGIOU E DECISION of 5 May 1980 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 5 mai 1980 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e A rticle 6, paragraph 1 of the Convention : Provision inapplicable to procedure of the cornpetent disciplinary body which issued a warning against a/awyer for a minor misdemeanor. A rticle 6, paragraphe 1, de la Convention : Disposition inapplicable à une procédure au cours de laquelle, pour une infraction de peu de gravité, les...

APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 8518/7 9 X . v/ the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMAN Y X . c/RÉPUBLIOUE FÉDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISiON ol 14 March 1980 on the admissibility ol the application DÉCISION du 14 mars 1980 sur la recevablité de la requèt e Article 3 of the Convention :Forced adminisvarion of inedicines to a menrally abnormal prisoner in a psychiatric hospital, subject to judicial control. Manifestly ill-founded . Article 8 of the Convention : Menrally abnormal offender provided wirh a guardian in particular to authorise ntedical trearntent . Lawful interference justified, in this case, as necessary for the prevention of disorder and...

APPLICATION/REOUETE N° 8083/7 7 X . v/the UNITED KINGDO M X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 13 March 1980 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 13 mars 19 80 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Article 5, paragraph 1 Icl of the Convention :/ndividual deprived of his liberty for several hours pursuant to a bench warrant for contempt of court . The fact that the Court of Appeal subsequently absolved the applicant does not imply that the original detention was invalid. An'icle 6, peregreph 1 and peregraph 3 b of the Convention : An acquitted defendant may not complain of alleged bias of the Court or of difficulties he...

APPLICATIQN/REQUÈTE N° 8427/78 X . v/the NETHERLAND S X . c/PAYS-BA S DECISION of 13 March 1980 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DÉCISION du 13 mars 1980 sur la recevabilité de la requête Article 6, paragraph I of the Convention : Length of proceedings concerning the determination of a divorced father's right of access to h!s child, with the dismissal of a request to provisionally authorise a meeting during the proceedings . Complaint declared admtssible : Refusal by cou rts to grant to a divorced fathe r .Article8ofhCnv the right of access to his child, as the latter might be subject to stress given the /act that the...

APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 8788/79 X . v/SWITZERLAN D X . c/SUISS E DECISION of 12 March 1980 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 12 mars 1980 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 5, paragraph Ic of the Convention : This provision permits the detention on remand of an extradited accused even after the judicial inrestigation has been concluded, where other charges are postponed pending a further applic•ation for extradition . Article 5, paragraph 3, of the Convention : There is nothing to prevent the taking into account of the threat of further criminal proceedings. even ifthev depend upon a State granting...