La jurisprudences de CEDH - page 825

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATIQN/REQUÉTE N° 8041/7 7 X . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY X . c/RÉPUBLIQUE FÉDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 15 December 1977 on the admissibilily of the application DÉCISION du 15 décembre 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Artic% 8, paragraph I of the Convention : The expulsion of someone from a country where his close relative live may interfere with his right to respect for family life . In rhe case of a married person, the possibility of the one spouse to follow the other is a relevant factor. Artic% 8, paragraph 2 of the Convention : Serious...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 8042/7 7 Lucie HAGMANN-HÜSLER v/SWITZERLAN D Lucie HAGMANN-HUSLER c/SUISS E DECISION of 15 December 1977 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DÉCISION du 15 décembre 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requête Article 8, paragraph I of the Convention : Does the use of the maiden name for the purpose of standing in a parliamentary election come within the sphere of "private life" ? Question not pursued of the Convention, combined withlArtice14 articles 8 and 12 of the Convention : The obligation placed on members of a family to bear the same...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 7397/76 Wilhelm PEYER v/SWITZERLAN D Wilhelm PEYER c/SUISS E DECISION ot 13 December 1977 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DÉCISION du 13 décembre 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 5 of the Convention : The Swiss reservation does not apply where the deprivation of liberty based on provisions of federal law, is as such challenged. Articte 5, paragraph 1 of the Convention : Confinement in an institution without being allowed to leave, constitutes a deprivation of liberty . Article 5, paragraph 1 e of the Convention : Need...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATIQN/REQUETE N° 7721/7 6 X . v/the NETHERLAND S X .c/PAYS-RA S DECISION of 12 December 1977 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 12 décembre 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Article 7, paragraph 1 of the Convention : No violation of this provision, the applicant having failed in hfs attempt to show that the legal provision on the basis of which he was convicted had become obsolete through constant practice . Article 14 of the Convention in conjunction with article 7 of the Convention : In criminal matters, discrimination could not arise from...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATIDN/REQUÉTE N° 7911/77 X . v/Swede n X . c/SuZd e DECISION of 12 December 1977 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISIDN du 12 décembre 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 1 paragraph 1 of the Convention : Thls provision guarantees in principle the right of each mother or lather to maintain contacts with their children . Article 8, paragraph 2 of the Convention : Exceptional circumstances justifying the refusal to the father of the right of access to his children, as being a measure necessary for their healrh and morals . Article 2 of the...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 8081/7 7 X . v/the UNITED KINGDOM ' X . c/ROYAUME-UNI ' DECISION of 12 December 1977 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 12 décembre 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e A rticle 5 paragraph 1J of the Convention : Only the existence of extradition or deportation proceedings justifies detention according to this provision . The detention may cease to be jusri/iéd if the proceedings are not conducted wirh the necessary diligence . Examination of the development of those proceedings in the present case . Article 5 paragraphe 1...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQU@TE N° 7379/76 X . v/the UNITED KINGDOM X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 10 December 1976 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 10 décembre 1976 sur la recevabilité de la requéte Articfe 26 of the Convention : Six months'rule a In the absence of any remedy against a decision or an act of a public authority, the period runs from the moment the decision or the act takes effect . b The act that deprives someone of his property does not give rise to a continuing situation of lack of property, which prevented the running of the period . Article...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE No . 6504/74 Dieter PREIKHZAS v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY' Dieter PREIKHZAS c/RÉPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE ' DECISION of 7 December 1977 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DÉCISION du 7 décembre 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e An'icte 5, paragraph 1 of the Convention : Question whether a dispute between a public admintstration and one of its employees under contract concerns the determination of the latter's civil righrs and obligations . Length of proceedings before labour courts. Importance attached to the sreps undertaken...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7614/76 Hans-Joachim NAGEL v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMAN Y Hans-Joachim NAGEL c/REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 7 December 1977 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 7 décembre 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requêl e Article 6, paragraph 1 of the Convention : Criminal proceedings lasting approximately 12 years. Determination of the period to be taken into consideration . Criteria ror deciding on the reasonableness of the length of proceedings recalled Application declared admtssib/e . Article 6, paragraphe 1, de la...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATIQN/REQU ETE N° 7759/77 Walter BUCHHOLZ v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY' Walter BUCHHOLZ c/REPUBLIQUE FÉDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGNE ' DECISION ol 7 December 1977 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISIQN du 7 décembre 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e A rtic% 6, paragraph 1 of the Convention : Reasonable time Icivill . Criteria for assessmen t a the steps raken by the applicant in order to expedite proceedings ; b the question whether the applicant himself can be held responsible for the delays IApplication declared admissib/el . Articfe 6, paragraphe...