Page 842 des 8 578 résultats trouvés :
| X. c. REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE
Art. 6-1 ACCES A UN TRIBUNAL, Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 6541/74 X . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY X . c/RÃPUBLIQUE FÃDÃRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 9 July 1975 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 9 juillet 1975 sur la recevabilité de la requite Article 5, paragraph 3, of the Convention : a Reasonable time : as a general rule, an accused person cannot automaticafty be held responsible for any prolongation of the proceedings while he is in detention, mereN because he has availed himself of rights to which he...
Art. 6-1 ACCES A UN TRIBUNAL, Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 6172/7 3 X . v/UNITED KINGDOM X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 7 July 1975 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 7 juillet 1975 sur la recevabilité de la requPt é Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention : The Commission is not called upon to decide whether or not domestic courts have correctly assessed evidence before them, buth whether evidence for and against the accused has been presented in such a manner and the proceedings in general have been conducted in...
Art. 6-1 ACCES A UN TRIBUNAL, Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 5923/72 X . v/NORWAY X .c/NORVÃG E DECISION of 30 May 1975 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 30 mai 1975 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 6, paragraph 3, fitt . c of the Convention : First instance proceedings . This .provision guarantees that proceedings against the accused will nor take place without adequate representation for the defence, but does not give the accused the right to decide himself in what manner his defence should be assured...
| BAADER, MEINS, MEINHOF, GRUNDMANN c. REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE
Art. 6-1 ACCES A UN TRIBUNAL, Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 6166/7 3 Andreas BAADER, Holger MEINS, Ulrike MEINHOF, Wolfgang GRUNDMANN v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMAN Y c/REPUBLIQUE FÃDÃRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 30 May 1975 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 30 mai 1975 sur la recevabilité de la requèt e Articles 8 and 10 of the Convention : The restrictive measures imposed on the applicants did not amount to sensory isolation nor to a break of contacts both inside and outside the prison. Given the fact that the...
| W., X., Y. et Z. c. BELGIQUE
Art. 6-1 ACCES A UN TRIBUNAL, Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES... APPLICATIONS/REQUÃTES N° 6745/74 et N° 6746/7 4 W ., X ., Y . and Z . v/BELGIUM W . . X ., Y . et Z . c/BELGIOU E DECISION of 30 May 1975 on the admissibility of the applications DÃCISION du 30 mai 1975 sur la recevabilité des requPte s A rtic/e 3 of Protocol N° 1 : a The term "Legislature" must be interpreted in the light of the institutions established by the constitutions of the Contracting Parties . b This provision guarantees, in principle, the right to vote and the right to stand for...
Art. 6-1 ACCES A UN TRIBUNAL, Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 6185/73 X . v/AUSTRIA X . c/AUTRICH E DECISION of 29 May 1975 on the admissibility of the application DÃCISION du 29 mai 1975 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Article 6, paragraph 3 of the Convention : The rights secured under this provision are those of the defence in general not those of the accused considered separately. Article 6, paragraph 3, litt. a of the Convention : One cannot derive from this provision a general right for the accused to have the Court files...
Art. 6-1 ACCES A UN TRIBUNAL, Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES... APPLÃCATION/REQUETE N° 6231/73 Ilse HESS v/UNITED KINGDOM Ilse HESS c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 28 May 1975 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 28 mai 1975 sur la recevabilitA de ta requbt e Art/c/e I of the Convention : The United Kingdom acts only as a partner in the joint quadripartite orgenisation of the Spandau Prison and of R . Hess' detention. It does not follow from that United Kingdom's participation that the administration and supervision of the prison are a matter "within...
| KÖNIG c. REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE
Art. 6-1 ACCES A UN TRIBUNAL, Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 8732/73 Eberhard KONIG v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY Eberhard KONIG c/REPUBLIQUE FÃDERALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 27 May 1975 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 27 mai 1975 sur la recevabilité de la requête . Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention : Whether the right to practise medicine and the right to manage one's private hospital are civil rights in the meaning of this Article . Question requiring an cxamination of the merits of the case. Article...
Art. 6-1 ACCES A UN TRIBUNAL, Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 6591/74 X . v/the NETHERLANDS X . c/PAYS-BAS DECISION of 26 May 1975 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 26 mai 1975 sur la recevabilité de la requPt e Article 5, paragraph I a, of the Convention : The "removal at the disposal of the Government" in accordance with Article 37 of the Dutch Criminal Code is a detention after conviction. Articfe 5, paregraphe 1a , de fe Convention : La «mise à la disposition du Gouvernement n prévue A l'article 37 du code...
Art. 6-1 ACCES A UN TRIBUNAL, Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES... shown that such remedies are both practicable and normally functioning in such cases . This, however, has not been established by the respondent Government . In particular, the Government have not shown how Art . 114 of the Constitution of Turkey can extend to all the alleged complaints or how any proceedings could be effectively handled given the very large number of these complaints . 15 . The Commission therefore does not find that, in the particular situation prevailing in Cyprus since the...