La jurisprudences de CEDH - page 824

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATIQN/REQUÉTE N° 6871/7 5 Franco CAPRINO v/the UNITED KINGDQM ' Franco CAPRINO c/ROYAUME-UNI ' DECISION of 3 March 1978 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DECISIDN du 3 mars 1978 sur la recevabiiité de la requét e Article 5, paragraph 1 of the Convention :"Lawful detenubn lDétention régufiére" means : in accordance with domestic law applicable as regards both procedure and merits. Where a Member State of the European Communities is concerned, community law must also be taken into consideration to the extent that it fs self-executing Directive No . 641221...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7287/75 X . v/AUSTRIA ' X . c/AUTRICHE ' DECISION of 3 March 1978 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 3 mars 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requét e A rtic% 1, paragraph 2 of the First Protocol : Neither the imposition of customs duties, nor fines on smuggled goods, nor the forfeiture of those goods are contrary to this provision . The Commission is, however, required to examine whether it is satisfied that these measures, which are in principle permitted by Article 1, para. 2, are not manifestly disproportionate to their aim...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATIDN/REQUETE N° 7525/76 X . v/the UNITED KINGDO M X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 3 March 1978 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DECISIQN du 3 mars 1978 sur la recevabilitA de la requêt e Article 8 of the Convention : The effect of the repression of homosexuality on the private life of a homosexuel Complaint declared admissible . The repression of outrage to public morals or outrage to public decency do not seem to affect private life. Article 11 of the Convention : The repression of outrage to public morals or outrage to public decency do not affect in...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 7806/77 Ronald Roger WEBSTER v/the UNITED KINGDOM Ronald Roger WEBSTER c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 3 March 1978 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 3 mars 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Article 11 of the Convention : Does this provision guarantee the right not to join a trade-union ? Application declared admissible . Article 25 of the Convention : Where an application concerns facts that affect, apart from the applicant, various other persons, the Commission examines it only in so far as the applicant is himseff affected...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7456/76 Paul Henry WIGGINS v/the UNITED KINGDOM ' Paul Henry WIGGINS c/ROYAUME-UNI ' DECISION of 8 February 1978 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 8 février 1978 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Article 8, paragraph 1 of the Convention : A dwelling house, legally acquired by a person and occupied for several years does not cease to be his "home" within the meaning of Article 8 1 merely because due to unforeseen circumstances, this person is no longer authorized to reside therein. Article 8, paragraph 2, of the Convention...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... DECISION OF THE COMMISSIO N 19 . The application was lodged on 5 October 1963 shortly after the beginning of the first academic year after the entry into force of the Belgian Acts of 1962 and 1963 determining the linguistic regions and prescribing the rules governing the use of languages in education . Eighteen months later, in April 1965, the applicants' representative stated that none of the applicants' children had been expelled from the French section of the European school in Mol . From statements made at a later period by members of the Belgian Government, which have...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATIQN/NEQUETE N° 7229/7 5 X . and Y . v/the UNITED KINGDO M X . et Y . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 15 December 1977 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DÉCISIDN du 15 décembre 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requèt e Artic% 8, paragraph 1 of the Convention : This provfsion guarantees only a right to respect for exisring famify life . Factual circumstances leading to a conclusion of absence of family life despite certain legal binds and maintenance allowances. Article 12 of the Convention : The adoption of a child by a couple might, in certain circumstances, be...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATIQN/REQUÉTE N° 7511/76 Grace CAMPBELL v/the UNITED KINGDQM ' Grace CAMPBELL c/ROYAUME-UNI ' DECISION of 15 December 1977 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DÉCISIQN du i5 décembre 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e A rtic%s 3 and 25 of the Convention : Can a child claim to be a victim of a violation of Article 3 if he risks being subjected to corporal punlshment at his school whilst such punishment had not in fact been inflicted on him . Question reserved for examination to merits of the case . Article 26 of the Convention : In the case in point...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATIQN/REQUÉTE N° 7547/7 6 X . v/the UNITED KINGDO M X . c/RQYAUME-UN I DECISION of 15 December 1977 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISIQN du 15 décembre 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article I of the Convention : The acts of State officials, including dipfomatic or consular agents, bring persons and property under the jurisdiction of that State, to the extent that they exercise their authority in respect of these persons or that property . Les actes des fonctionnaires d'un Etat, y Article fer de fa Convention compris des agents diplomatiques...

Art. 14 DISCRIMINATION, Art. 9-1 LIBERTE DE RELIGION ... APPLICATION/REQUÉTE N° 7743/76 J .Y . COSANS, on behalf of her son, Jeffrey Steven COSANS v/UNITED KINGDO M JY . COSANS, agissant au nom de son fils Jeffrey Steven COSANS' c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 15 December 1977 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 15 décembre 1977 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Artic%s 3 and 25 of the Convention : Can a child claim to be a victirrr of a violation of Article 3 if he risks being subjected to corporal punishment at his school whilst such corporal punishment have not in fact been inflicted on him ?Question reserved...