Page 836 des 8 578 résultats trouvés :
| X. c. REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE
Art. 10-1 LIBERTE D'EXPRESSION, Art. 10-2 DEFENSE DE L'ORDRE, Art. 10-2 INGERENCE, Art. 10-2 NECESSAIRE DANS UNE SOCIETE DEMOCRATIQUE,... APPLICATION/REQU6TE N° 6946/7 5 X . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY X . c/REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 6 July 1976 on the admissibility of the application DÃCISION du 6 juillet 1976 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention : Right to be tried within a reasonable time in criminal mattea a . Time begins to run from the moment when the suspicion of the person concerned has important repercussions on his situation in the present case...
Art. 10-1 LIBERTE D'EXPRESSION, Art. 10-2 DEFENSE DE L'ORDRE, Art. 10-2 INGERENCE, Art. 10-2 NECESSAIRE DANS UNE SOCIETE DEMOCRATIQUE,... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7512/7 6 X . v/the NETHERLANDS X . c/PAYS-BA S DECISION of 6 July 1976 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 6 juillet 1976 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 7 of the Convention : The notion of "guilty" in the first paragraph does not cover the decision to grant the extradition of an individua/. Article 7 de la Convention : La notion de rrcondamnationu, au sens du premier paragraphe, ne vise pas la décision d'accorder l'extradition d'un...
Art. 10-1 LIBERTE D'EXPRESSION, Art. 10-2 DEFENSE DE L'ORDRE, Art. 10-2 INGERENCE, Art. 10-2 NECESSAIRE DANS UNE SOCIETE DEMOCRATIQUE,... APPLICATION/REQUÃTE N° 6148/73 X . v/UNITED KINGDOM X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 5 July 1976 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 5 juillet 1976 sur la recevabilitA de la requét e Articfe 26 of the Convention : Exhaustion of domestic remedies . In the case of an allegedly illegal search of a home, whoever claims to have the right to the home should, if necessary establish it in law in order to exhaust domestic remedies . Article 26 de la Convention : Epuisement des voies...
Art. 10-1 LIBERTE D'EXPRESSION, Art. 10-2 DEFENSE DE L'ORDRE, Art. 10-2 INGERENCE, Art. 10-2 NECESSAIRE DANS UNE SOCIETE DEMOCRATIQUE,... APPLICATION/ REQU ETES N° 6621/74 Herbe rt HUBER v/AUSTRIA Herbe rt HUBER c/AUTRICH E DECISION of 5 July 1976 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 5 juillet 1976 sur la recevabilité de la requÃt e Article 5 of the Convention an d Article 26 of the Convention : Six months period. Can the Commission, without infringing the six months rule, examine an application concerning the compatibility of a detention with Article 5, paragraphs 1-4, of the Convention, when the only final...
| AFFAIRE ENGEL ET AUTRES c. PAYS-BAS
Art. 10-1 LIBERTE D'EXPRESSION, Art. 10-2 DEFENSE DE L'ORDRE, Art. 10-2 INGERENCE, Art. 10-2 NECESSAIRE DANS UNE SOCIETE DEMOCRATIQUE,... COUR PLÉNIÈRE AFFAIRE ENGEL ET AUTRES c. PAYS-BAS Requête no 5100/71; 5101/71; 5102/71; 5354/72; 5370/72 ARRÊT STRASBOURG 8 juin 1976 En l'affaire Engel et autres, La Cour européenne des Droits de l'Homme, statuant en séance plénière par application de l'article 48 de son règlement et composée des juges dont le nom suit: MM. H. MOSLER, président, A. VERDROSS, M. ZEKIA, J. CREMONA, G. WIARDA, P. O'DONOGHUE, Mme H. PEDERSEN, MM. T...
Art. 11 LIBERTE DE REUNION ET D'ASSOCIATION, Art. 11-1 FONDER ET S'AFFILIER A DES SYNDICATS, Art. 11-1 INTERET DES MEMBRES ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 6565/74 X . v/UNITED KINGDOM X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 21 May 1976 on the admissibility of the application DÃCISION du 21 mai 1976 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Article 5, paregraphe 1t of the Convention : Examination of the relevant provisions of an extradition treaty in order to determine whether the detention with a view to extradition is "tawful". Article 25 of the Convention : Victim of a violation . The Commission need not examine an argument which does not...
Art. 11 LIBERTE DE REUNION ET D'ASSOCIATION, Art. 11-1 FONDER ET S'AFFILIER A DES SYNDICATS, Art. 11-1 INTERET DES MEMBRES ... APPLICATION/REQU ETE N° 6741/74 X . v/ITALY X . c/ITAL Y DECISION of 21 May 1976 on the admissibility of the application DÃCISION du 21 mai 1976 sur la recevabilité de la requét e A rticle 9, paragraph 2 of the Convention, Article 10, paragraph 2 of the Convention , Article 11, paragraph 2 of the Convention : The criminal repression . of schemings designed to restore the fascist party may be considered as necessary, in a democratic society for the protection of public order and the rights and...
| X. c. REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE
Art. 11 LIBERTE DE REUNION ET D'ASSOCIATION, Art. 11-1 FONDER ET S'AFFILIER A DES SYNDICATS, Art. 11-1 INTERET DES MEMBRES ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7014/7 5 X . v/FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY X . c/RÃPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 21 May 1976 on the admissibility of the application DÃCISION du 21 mai 1976 sur la recevabilité de la requAt e Article 6, paragraph I of the Convention : The legal proceedings relating to a claim for compensation under the Federal Compensation Act Bundesentschëdigungsgesetz do not relate to "civil rights and obligations" 6, paragraphe 1 de la Convention :.Article La procédure...
Art. 11 LIBERTE DE REUNION ET D'ASSOCIATION, Art. 11-1 FONDER ET S'AFFILIER A DES SYNDICATS, Art. 11-1 INTERET DES MEMBRES ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7237/75 X . v/DENMARK X .c/DANEMAR K DECISION of 21 May 1976 Striking off the list of cases DÃCISION du 21 mai 1976 IRadiation du rôle Article 3 of the Convention : Attempted suicide by foreigner about to be deponed to his home country . Residence permit granted by the respondent Government . Rule 43, paragreph 1, of the Rules of Procedure of the Commission : withdrawal of applicetion-Reasons of a general character affecting the observance of the Convention -Striking off the...
Art. 11 LIBERTE DE REUNION ET D'ASSOCIATION, Art. 11-1 FONDER ET S'AFFILIER A DES SYNDICATS, Art. 11-1 INTERET DES MEMBRES ... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 5759/72 X . v/AUSTRIA X . c/AUTRICH E DECISION OF 20 May 1976 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 20 mai 1976 sur la recevabilité de la requête Articte 26 of the Convention : Period of six months : a When there is no remedy, the period begins from the date of the decision complained against. b /n the case of judgment detivered in open court in the presence of the applicant's lawyer, the period starts to run from the date of delivery if the applicant would...