La jurisprudences de CEDH - page 845

Art. 6-1 ACCES A UN TRIBUNAL, Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 7010/75 X . v/BELGIUM X . c/BELGIQU E DECISION of 29 September 1975 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 29 septembre 1975 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 2 of Protocol N° 1 : This provision guarantees the right in principle to make use of educational facilities existing at a given moment . No obligation on the State to organise retreining programmes. Article 2 du Protocole additionnef : Cette disposition garantit le droit de se servir, en...

Art. 6-1 ACCES A UN TRIBUNAL, Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES... pourrait garantir la conformité des élections avec l'article 3 du Protocole additionnel à la Convention . La Commission estime que les mots « libre expression de l'opinion du peuple » signifient essentiellement que les élections ne sauraient comporter une quelconque pression sur le choix d'un ou plusieurs candidats et que, dans ce choix, l'électeur ne doit pas être indûment incité à voter pour un parti ou un autre . De plus, le mot « choix s signifie qu'il faut assurer aux différents...

Art. 6-1 ACCES A UN TRIBUNAL, Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES... APPLICATION/AEQUETE N° 5851/75 X . v/UNITED KINGDO M X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 14 July 1975 on the admissibility of the applicatio n DECISION du 14 juillet 1975 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Articfe 2 of the Convention : Right to life . Mortal shooting by a soldier. Non exhaustion . Article 26 of the Convention : - Exhaustion of domestic remedies -Applicant's obligation to have raised, during the domestic proceedings concerned, the substance of any complaint made before the Commission...

Art. 6-1 ACCES A UN TRIBUNAL, Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 6317/73 X . v/AUSTRIA X . c/AUTRICH E DECISION of 10 July 1975 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 10 juillet 1975 sur la recevabilité de le requPte Article 26 of the Convention : Six months time limit. a An application shall not be regarded as effectively introduced where the applicant has failed to provide informations requested by the Secretary of the Commission after a first letter of a general character . b The mere reference to a bad state of heahh...

Art. 6-1 ACCES A UN TRIBUNAL, Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 6337/73 X . v/BELGIUM X . c/BELGIQU E DECISION of 10 July 1975 on the admissibility of the application DÉCISION du 10 juillet 1975 sur la recevabilité de la requBt e Article 3 of the Convention : The exercise time constitutes in itself an alleviation of the stringencies of detention. The use of individual exercise yards did not amount in the present case to treatment prohibited by this provision . Right not guaranteed : The Convention contains no Article providing for...

Art. 6-1 ACCES A UN TRIBUNAL, Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 6082/74 X . v/BELGIUM and the NETHERLANDS X . c/BELGIQUE et PAYS-BA S DECISION of 10 July 1975 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 10 juillet 1975 sur la recevebilitA de la requêt e Article 8 of the Convention : Family life . Article 8 applies in principle to the relations between the adoptive parents and adoptive child, but does not oblige the State to grant to a person the status of adoptive perent or adopted child . Article 12 of the Convention : The right...

Art. 6-1 ACCES A UN TRIBUNAL, Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 6742/74 X . v/FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY X . c/REPUBLIOUE FEDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 10 July 1975 on the admissibility of the applicâtion DÉCISION du 10 juillet 1975 sur la recevabilité de la requét e Right not guaranteed : The Convention does not guarantee the right to seNdetermination . Article I of Protocol No . 1 : Can a person expropriated by a State not Party to the Convention, lodge an application based on this provision against his own State, on the ground...

Art. 6-1 ACCES A UN TRIBUNAL, Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 6541/74 X . v/the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY X . c/RÉPUBLIQUE FÉDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGN E DECISION of 9 July 1975 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 9 juillet 1975 sur la recevabilité de la requite Article 5, paragraph 3, of the Convention : a Reasonable time : as a general rule, an accused person cannot automaticafty be held responsible for any prolongation of the proceedings while he is in detention, mereN because he has availed himself of rights to which he...

Art. 6-1 ACCES A UN TRIBUNAL, Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 6172/7 3 X . v/UNITED KINGDOM X . c/ROYAUME-UN I DECISION of 7 July 1975 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 7 juillet 1975 sur la recevabilité de la requPt é Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention : The Commission is not called upon to decide whether or not domestic courts have correctly assessed evidence before them, buth whether evidence for and against the accused has been presented in such a manner and the proceedings in general have been conducted in...

Art. 6-1 ACCES A UN TRIBUNAL, Art. 6-1 DELAI RAISONNABLE, Art. 6-1 DROITS ET OBLIGATIONS DE CARACTERE CIVIL, Art. 6-1 PROCES... APPLICATION/REQUETE N° 5923/72 X . v/NORWAY X .c/NORVÈG E DECISION of 30 May 1975 on the admissibility of the application DECISION du 30 mai 1975 sur la recevabilité de la requêt e Article 6, paragraph 3, fitt . c of the Convention : First instance proceedings . This .provision guarantees that proceedings against the accused will nor take place without adequate representation for the defence, but does not give the accused the right to decide himself in what manner his defence should be assured...